Documentary Summaries Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words

Documentary Summaries - Essay ExampleLars Larson, a gay man, is the docudramas first interviewee and speaks positively and in an undisguised means about being a homosexual. The interview is followed by a CBS News poll that shows opinions from Americans that quirk harms America even more than prostitution or adultery. Another gay man is interviewed and he talks about coming out and being hard-boiled like a wounded animal, which differs from the opinion of the next interviewee, Warren Adkins, who claims his family treated him warmly. The documentary then talks about homosexualitys legal aspects with uniting Carolina Judge James Craven, who notes that the US should decriminalize homosexuality like in England. Frank Kameny, the co-founder of the Washington D.C. Mattachine branch then makes an impassioned plea to allow protective covering clearance for homosexuals. There is also a debate on homosexuality between Albert Goldman and Gore Vidal who argue for and against homosexuality r espectively. The interviews end with a family man who claims he is gay and that the US was too narcissistic for two men to form a long-term relationship. The documentary ends with the filmmaker cont destination that the homosexual in America is anonymous, displaced, and an outsider. virtuoso of the most poignant moments in the documentary is the short interview involving the gay man, Warren Adkins, who contends that ones sexual orientation is their innermost aspect and that, precisely as a heterosexual would not give their orientation up a homosexual like himself would not either (Kraemer 1). He responds to a fountainhead on what causes him to be a homosexual by saying that he does not concern himself with it, putting his homosexuality in the same category as having blonde hair. He contends that he does not dwell on why he is gay, just as a person with blonde hair would not worry about the chromosomes or genes that caused them to have blonde hair. As a part of the broadcast docume ntarys research, the TV station carried out a demographic survey, which found that at least 90% of wad in the US considered homosexuality to be a sickness (Kraemer 1). Majority of them even kick upstairs legal punishment for acts of homosexuality carried out anywhere, including sex between two consenting adult males in private. One fascinating aspect of this segment is the manner in which it completely neglects to do a survey on lesbians as part of the society of homosexuals, while also portraying homosexual men as incapable of being monogamous long-term unions and as naturally promiscuous. Even as this point to the failures of civil rights and general trauma that these issues caused in the late 60s, it is raise that the same debate rages on to date as the world argues on gay marriage and the right of gay men and lesbians to legalize their monogamous relationships in the long term. It leaves one wondering whether a documentary made on lesbians and gays today would sound as antiqu ated and foreign as this documentary fifty six years from today (Kraemer 1). While this documentary was made and released at a time when the United States had transgender people, bisexuals, gay men, and lesbians had come out, these people were fewer than they atomic number 18 today, as well as courageous (Kraemer 1). This documentary is particularly important when looking at the people, in this case men, who have fought for the equality of homosexuals in society. Because these people were courageous enough to be on a documentary, including Albert Goldman and Lars Larsson, they made things happen and were important in the progress made towards equality. This documentary, especially its uninspiring and biased ending that claims homosexuals are